Skip to main content
· 4/19/2007

3511 13th Street Tenants' Ass'n v. 3511 13th Street, N.W. Residences, LLC

Citations

  • 922 A.2d 439
  • 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 226
  • 2007 WL 1144797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[a] promise is a sufficient consideration for a return promise” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “Whether a particular breach of a contract- is ‘material’ - is a classic issue of fact.”
  • “Whether a particular breach of a contract is ‘material’ is a classic issue of fact.”
  • “ ‘For a breach to be material, it must be so serious [as] to destroy the es- sential object of the agreement’ ”
  • “ `For a breach to be material, it must be so serious [as] to destroy the essential object of the agreement' ”
  • one party’s material breach of contract relieves the other “of 14 any duty to perform”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farrell, Ruiz, Schwelb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.