Skip to main content
· 10/31/2003

Ali v. L.A. Focus Publication

Citations

  • 5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 791
  • 112 Cal. App. 4th 1477
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9513
  • 20 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 892
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 11985
  • 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • that reporter was paid by the article is indicative of an independent contractor relationship, but that fact alone is not dispositive if other indicia of employment are present
  • that reporter was paid by the article is indicative of an independent contractor relationship, but that fact alone is not dispositive if other indicia of employment are present
  • “Several appellate courts ... have held that, because independent contractors are not employees, they lack standing to assert a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perluss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.