California Court of Appeal· 10/31/2003
Ali v. L.A. Focus Publication
Citations
- 5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 791
- 112 Cal. App. 4th 1477
- 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9513
- 20 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 892
- 2003 Daily Journal DAR 11985
- 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1637
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- that reporter was paid by the article is indicative of an independent contractor relationship, but that fact alone is not dispositive if other indicia of employment are present
- that reporter was paid by the article is indicative of an independent contractor relationship, but that fact alone is not dispositive if other indicia of employment are present
- “Several appellate courts ... have held that, because independent contractors are not employees, they lack standing to assert a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perluss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2010-08-05· cited 657×
- Narayan v. EGL, INC.Ninth Circuit· 2010-07-13· cited 110×
- Vernon v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-02-25· cited 83×
- Bowman v. WyattCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-07-01· cited 56×
- Hennighan v. Insphere Insurance SolutionsN.D. California· 2014-04-21· cited 9×
- Rall v. Tribune 365 LLCCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-01-17· cited 2×
- Narayan v. EGL, INC.Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-05
- Rall v. Tribune 365, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-12-18
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court· 1976-02-27· cited 4,982×
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court· 2001-07-11· cited 2,941×
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2000-10-05· cited 1,654×
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court· 1988-12-29· cited 948×
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 695×
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2001-08-06· cited 637×
- Monitor Patriot Co. v. RoySupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 520×
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-03-23· cited 309×
- Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court· 1998-08-31· cited 294×
- Stevenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-08-27· cited 248×
- Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court· 1998-07-09· cited 200×
- Fort v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-05-28· cited 184×
- Sharon P. v. Arman, Ltd.California Supreme Court· 1999-12-16· cited 142×
- Binder v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-10-14· cited 119×
- Tieberg v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.California Supreme Court· 1970-07-30· cited 112×
- Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-05-22· cited 96×
- ELSENBERG v. Alameda Newspapers, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1999-09-20· cited 86×
- Swat-Fame, Inc. v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-08-05· cited 41×
- Jersey v. John Muir Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-04-16· cited 26×
- Sistare-Meyer v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Metropolitan Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-10-01· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.