Skip to main content

Alexander v. State

Citations

  • 2002 OK CR 23
  • 48 P.3d 110
  • 73 O.B.A.J. 1667
  • 2002 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 28
  • 2002 WL 1067320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant made no record showing the extent of judge’s participation in defendant’s treatment and/or judge’s involvement as member of drug court team which supported a claim of bias
  • defendant made no record showing the extent of the supervisory judge’s participation in the defendant’s treatment and involvement as a member of the team that would support an allegation of bias
  • court unpersuaded by defendant’s allegation of bias in judge’s decision to terminate him from drug court program, premised solely on judge’s position as a member of the drug court team, in part because evidence contained more than sufficient evidence to support termination decision
  • supervising judge’s role on drug team is an adjudicator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumpkin, Johnson, Viee, Chapel, Strubhar, Lile

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.