Skip to main content

Albertson v. State

Citations

  • 554 P.2d 661
  • 89 N.M. 499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an objection based on relevancy was specific enough to alert the trial court that the testimony was improper under the rule addressing the admissibility of prior misdemeanor offenses
  • no waiver by failure to raise specific objection when court alerted to the impropriety of questioning
  • no waiver by failure to raise specific objection when court alerted to the impropriety of questioning
  • objection to relevancy of misdemeanor convictions implicitly asserts policy behind excluding such evidence under SCRA 1986, 11-609
  • general evidentiary objection adequate although citation to specific evidentiary rule omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sosa, Oman, McManus, Montoya, Easley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.