Skip to main content
· 9/29/1995

Albert v. Albert (In Re Albert)

Citations

  • 187 B.R. 697
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1415
  • 1995 WL 590228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “postpetition payments due to a former spouse . . . are not debts until each payment is due, and [they] are not subject to discharge under § 727(b)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Julie A. Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.