A.L. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two individuals between two apartment buildings pulling themselves up to look into windows at 7:15 p.m. in December was insufficient to establish that the individuals were loitering at a time, in a place, or in a manner unusual for law-abiding individuals
• “And although A.L. and his companion were seen looking into apartment windows, A.L. did not possess any tools, and the police officers did not observe him trying to pry open any of the windows.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• R.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-09· cited 6×
• M.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-14· cited 5×
• AL v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-18
• T.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-18

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• State v. Ecker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-02-19· cited 174×
• A.P.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-21· cited 46×
• Chamson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-21· cited 14×
• Addis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-01-30· cited 8×
• P.N. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-27· cited 8×
• K.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-08· cited 7×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-23· cited 5×