Addis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that defendant, who looked like a drifter, observed by an officer walking down an alley at 2:40 a.m., looking into parked vehicles, did not justify an arrest for loitering and prowling
• noting that looking into the windows of parked vehicles at 2:40 a.m., where no door handles were tried and no vehicles were repeatedly circled, cannot be considered criminal activity
• noting that looking into the windows of parked vehicles at 2:40 a.m., where no door handles were tried and no vehicles were repeatedly circled, cannot be considered criminal activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• K.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-08· cited 7×
• R.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-09· cited 6×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-23· cited 5×
• A.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-18· cited 4×
• KH v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-08
• AL v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-18
• Sims v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-13

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ecker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-02-19· cited 174×
• D.A. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-11· cited 64×
• L.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-08· cited 19×
• Chamson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-21· cited 14×