AK v. Behavioral Health Sys., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under case law “when a party fails to respond to an argument, that argument is generally deemed to be unopposed and the proposition conceded”
• explaining that under case law “when a party fails to respond to an argument, that argument is generally deemed to be unopposed and the proposition conceded” (citation omitted)
• explaining that under case law, “when a party fails to respond to an argument, that argument is generally deemed to be unopposed and the proposition conceded” (citation omitted)
• “[W]hen a party fails to respond to an argument, that argument is generally deemed to be unopposed and the proposition conceded”
• “[W]hen a party fails to respond to an argument, that argument is generally deemed to be unopposed and the proposition conceded”
• “Under this Court’s Local Rules, when a party fails to respond to an argument, that argument is generally deemed to be unopposed and the proposition conceded. L.R. 7.01(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North America
  Sixth Circuit· 1998-08-04· cited 535×
• Unnamed case
  Sixth Circuit· 2006-08-07· cited 219×
• Coalition for Parity, Inc. v. Sebelius
  District of Columbia· 2010-06-21· cited 27×
• Administrative Committee of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gamboa
  Eighth Circuit· 2007-03-07· cited 12×
• Sullivan v. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young U.S.
  N.D. Ohio· 2008-08-26· cited 5×