Skip to main content
· 6/21/2010

Coalition for Parity, Inc. v. Sebelius

Citations

  • 709 F. Supp. 2d 10
  • 49 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1519
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60941
  • 2010 WL 2484269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[e]ven on a motion to 15 dismiss, the Court need not accept as true” the plaintiff’s conclusory allegations that a statement is 16 actionable
  • finding that an information technology analyst’s assessment and 11 ranking of a software company in an industry report distributed to potential customers of the software 12 company is a “non-actionable opinion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.