Washington Supreme Court· 1/12/2017

Aiken v. Aiken

Citations

187 Wash. 2d 491
387 P.3d 680

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the procedures in the DVPA (predecessor to chapter 7.105 RCW
awarding appellate attorney fees to petitioner in domestic violence protection order proceeding who was the prevailing party on appeal
applying balancing test in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335, 96 S. Ct. 893, 47 L. Ed. 2d 18 (1976
due process does not require trial - 16 - No. 80949-1-I/17 court to allow parent to cross examine child regarding alleged domestic violence
due process does not require trial court to allow parent to cross examine child regarding alleged domestic violence
first factor weighed in favor of allowing cross-examination of the appellant’s daughter in hearing for one-year protection order that covered her, although cross-examination was ultimately not permitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairhurst, González, Johnson, Madsen, McCloud, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Aiken v. Aiken

17 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.