Skip to main content
· 5/29/2009

Aguilera v. Heiman

Citations

  • 174 Cal. App. 4th 590
  • 95 Cal. Rptr. 3d 18
  • 74 Cal. Comp. Cases 583
  • 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 845
  • 3 Cal. WCC 505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that timely notice was not satisfied where the defendants “were not named 14 within the limitations period” in a previous proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.