District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/10/2018
Aguila v. State
Citations
- 255 So. 3d 522
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Although the collateral crimes evidence and the charged offenses were allegedly committed twenty years apart, the intervening time is insufficient to render the collateral crimes evidence inadmissible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
- McLean v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 125×
- Beckman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-09-06· cited 21×
- Triplett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-09· cited 16×
- Mendez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-27· cited 14×
- Seavey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-15· cited 5×
- Elijah Brookins v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-04-20· cited 3×
- Delatorre v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.