E.D. New York· 6/15/1987
Agola v. Hagner
Citations
- 678 F. Supp. 988
- 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2377
- 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13032
- 1987 WL 34857
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Rule 59(e) motion must do more than seek reconsideration of the cumulative evidence and theories already considered by the court; it must present “controlling law or facts” which “compel” a change
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mishler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 1989-02-07· cited 65×
- Standard Quimica De Venezuela v. Central Hispano International, Inc.D. Puerto Rico· 1999-09-30· cited 43×
- Fitzgerald v. HendersonN.D. New York· 1999-03-12· cited 15×
- Hom v. BrennanE.D. New York· 2011-12-31· cited 10×
- Pahuta v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.W.D. New York· 1998-02-18· cited 8×
- In Re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos LitigationS.D. New York· 1991-04-19· cited 7×
- Fox v. City University of New YorkS.D. New York· 1999-05-05· cited 5×
- Geshwind v. GarrickS.D. New York· 1990-06-16· cited 4×
- In re Premier Golf Properties, LPS.D. California· 2016-05-27· cited 4×
- In re Hillis Motors, Inc.D. Hawaii· 1990-10-09· cited 3×
- DiPirro v. United StatesW.D. New York· 1999-07-06· cited 3×
- Mackay v. Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Ass'n-Seattle LocaL 14Ninth Circuit· 2004-01-13· cited 2×
- LAYME v. MatiasD. Puerto Rico· 2002-06-12· cited 1×
- Telephone Employees Organization, Local 1100, Communications Workers of America v. WoodsCivil Court of the City of New York· 1995-04-21· cited 1×
- Cosme-Rosado v. Serrano-RodriguezD. Puerto Rico· 2002-06-12
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 2,015×
- Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 1964-01-06· cited 403×
- Carbon Fuel Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court· 1979-12-10· cited 250×
- Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw Feeders, Inc., and Cross-Appellees v. Carrier Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Cross-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1975-02-25· cited 131×
- Local No. 11, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers v. HughesSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 112×
- Consolidated Data Terminals, a California Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., a Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1983-05-10· cited 109×
- Wolfsohn v. HankinSupreme Court· 1964-04-06· cited 90×
- N. Conant Webb, M.D. v. Department of Health and Human ServicesD.C. Circuit· 1982-12-14· cited 77×
- Sam E. Brown and Erma Jean Brown v. Freeman WrightNinth Circuit· 1978-12-26· cited 61×
- Henry Hughes v. Local No. 11 of International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers, Afl-CioThird Circuit· 1961-03-09· cited 60×
- Roganovich v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-11-12· cited 60×
- Bailey v. SharpSeventh Circuit· 1986-02-10· cited 55×
- Derbofen v. T. L. James & Co.Supreme Court· 1978-10-16· cited 54×
- Donald Moynahan v. Pari-Mutuel Employees Guild of California, Local 280Ninth Circuit· 1963-05-06· cited 46×
- Marane, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. McDonald Corporation & McDonald System, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1985-02-19· cited 46×
- Hollenbeck v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.E.D. Missouri· 1985-02-28· cited 46×
- Sandra Fulps v. The City of Springfield, TennesseeSixth Circuit· 1983-08-25· cited 45×
- Madelon J. Aguirre v. Automotive TeamstersNinth Circuit· 1980-11-19· cited 39×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hartmann Luggage CompanySixth Circuit· 1971-12-29· cited 38×
- Alvey v. General Electric Co.Seventh Circuit· 1980-06-11· cited 35×
Other cases named Agola v. Hagner
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.