Fitzgerald v. Henderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following Del Castillo and Rashid v. Beth Israel Med. Ctr., No. 96 Civ. 1833(AGS), 1998 WL 689931, at (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2,1998)
• no showing of \afo'r'inal or widespread identifiable discriminatory policy or practice\ (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Plaintiff .... has not even submitted an affidavit stating her version of the facts giving rise to the lawsuit”
• \Plaintiff.... has not even submitted an affidavit stating her version of the facts giving rise to the lawsuit\
• no showing of \a formal or widespread identifiable discriminatory policy or practice\ (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Plaintiffs claim, in its entirety, sounds in sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. She makes no allegations that Defendant maintained a retaliatory employment policy. Thus, Plaintiffs allegations of retaliation cannot be read to state a continuing violation claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).