D. Minnesota· 2/10/2017
AGCO Finance, LLC v. Littrell
Citations
- 320 F.R.D. 45
- 96 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1072
- 2017 WL 545878
- 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20998
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a “sum certain” for purposes of default judgment means “there is no doubt as to the amount to which a plaintiff is entitled as a result of the defendant’s default”
- recognizing a “sum certain” for purposes of default judgment means “there is no doubt as to the amount to which a plaintiff is entitled as a result of the defendant’s default”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 2,910×
- Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyNinth Circuit· 1988-02-24· cited 443×
- Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. And Michael Ackerman, Individually v. Fingerhut Corp.Eighth Circuit· 1996-06-26· cited 350×
- Johnson v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co.Eighth Circuit· 1998-04-03· cited 318×
- Calvin Berthelsen v. Maurice KaneSixth Circuit· 1990-09-10· cited 172×
- Stephenson Ex Rel. Estate of MJK Clearing, Inc. v. El-BatrawiEighth Circuit· 2008-04-30· cited 156×
- United States v. ManosS.D. Ohio· 1972-08-21· cited 23×
- Albert L. Pierson v. Dave DormireEighth Circuit· 2007-04-04· cited 21×
- United States v. Northshore Mining Co.Eighth Circuit· 2009-08-17· cited 17×
- Streambend Properties III, LLC v. Sexton Lofts, LLCD. Minnesota· 2014-01-28· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.