Aerostatic Engineering Corp. v. Szczawinski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding prior oral agreement could not modify contract where “[i]t is clear to [the court], from reading the document, that this represented the complete agreement between the parties with respect to the terms of payment”
• where defendant materially breached construction contract, plaintiff was permitted to cease performance and receive damages without setoff
• defendant's failure to pay large part of sum owed was \substantial breach going to the root of the 9 contract thus entitling the plaintiff to terminate\
• oral agreement regarding payment provision inadmissible where payment provision of contract was not ambiguous.
• oral agreement cannot modify payment terms unambiguously expressed in written contract
• oral agreement cannot modify payment terms unambiguously expressed in written contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).