Fifth Circuit· 4/21/1975

Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew

Citations

511 F.2d 710
1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the “judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction” “is entitled to a presumption of regularity.”
“Looking beyond the pleadings to what could have been pleaded, however, is precisely what is required by the federal law of res judicata.”
“Looking beyond the pleadings to what could have been pleaded, however, is precisely what is required by the federal law of res judicata.”
because both non-party county and party state boards desired that disputed land be conveyed to county, county in “such close relationship” to state boards and thus bound by outcome of litigation
“The very purpose of federal diversity jurisdiction is to avoid bias against parties from outside the forum state.”
“The very purpose of federal diversity jurisdiction is to avoid bias against parties from outside the forum state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ainsworth, Bell, Roney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

179 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

110 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.