Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction” “is entitled to a presumption of regularity.”
• “Looking beyond the pleadings to what could have been pleaded, however, is precisely what is required by the federal law of res judicata.”
• “Looking beyond the pleadings to what could have been pleaded, however, is precisely what is required by the federal law of res judicata.”
• because both non-party county and party state boards desired that disputed land be conveyed to county, county in “such close relationship” to state boards and thus bound by outcome of litigation
• “The very purpose of federal diversity jurisdiction is to avoid bias against parties from outside the forum state.”
• “The very purpose of federal diversity jurisdiction is to avoid bias against parties from outside the forum state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew
  N.D. Florida· 1973-11-21· cited 4×
• Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew
  N.D. Florida· 1973-03-08· cited 1×