N.D. California· 2/12/1999
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. National Semiconductor Corp.
Citations
- 38 F. Supp. 2d 802
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2656
- 1999 WL 137641
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that early activities at a facility incorporated into the final remedy cannot be considered in hindsight as remedial action
- “During the removal action phase, a site posing a risk of hazardous waste release is studied and various cleanup options considered.”
- “The fact that the extraction activities ultimately did not turn out to be short-term, because they were implemented in The final remedy four years later, cannot now be considered in hindsight.”
- “Removal refers to short-action taken to halt the immediate risks posed by hazardous wastes”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Whyte
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of California, on Behalf of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Neville Chemical Company, a CorporationNinth Circuit· 2004-02-10· cited 92×
- Geraghty & Miller, Inc. v. Conoco Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2000-12-14· cited 80×
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.C.D. California· 2003-10-31· cited 46×
- OBG Technical Services, Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. Ex Rel. TRW, Inc.D. Connecticut· 2007-08-30· cited 39×
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Artra Group, Inc.D. Maryland· 2001-01-12· cited 28×
- Cytec Industries, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.S.D. Ohio· 2002-08-14· cited 18×
- UNITED ALLOYS, INC. v. BakerC.D. California· 2011-06-22· cited 17×
- Unocal Corp. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2000-08-07· cited 13×
- City of Moses Lake v. United StatesE.D. Washington· 2006-10-16· cited 10×
- American Premier Underwriters Inc. v. General Electric Co.S.D. Ohio· 2012-03-31· cited 7×
- Incorporated Village of Garden City v. Genesco, Inc.E.D. New York· 2009-01-27· cited 5×
- City of Wichita v. Aero Holdings, Inc.D. Kansas· 2000-07-28· cited 5×
- California Ex Rel. California Department of Toxic Services v. Neville Chemical Co.C.D. California· 2002-03-26· cited 3×
- California River Watch v. Fluor Corp.N.D. California· 2015-10-14· cited 1×
- Unocal Corporation v. The United States Of AmericaNinth Circuit· 2000-08-07
- California River Watch v. Fluor Corp.N.D. California· 2015-08-07
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 376×
- Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1986-11-25· cited 205×
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1991-05-30· cited 171×
- Kelley v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Sixth Circuit· 1994-02-23· cited 139×
- Flannery v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-02-11· cited 126×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1995-03-17· cited 96×
- Beach Colony II v. California Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal· 1985-02-28· cited 94×
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Supreme Court· 1996-04-04· cited 72×
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1997-07-02· cited 66×
- Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal· 1990-02-21· cited 61×
- Sun Co. v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1997-08-14· cited 53×
- United States of America and State of Indiana v. Navistar International Transportation CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1998-10-16· cited 34×
- Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.N.D. Florida· 1995-05-17· cited 31×
- Satrap v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal· 1996-01-31· cited 31×
- City of Merced v. FieldsE.D. California· 1998-03-12· cited 27×
- Gould Inc. v. a & M Battery and Tire ServiceM.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-09-14· cited 26×
- California Ex Rel. California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Hyampom Lumber Co.E.D. California· 1995-09-18· cited 24×
- Kfc Western, Inc. v. Alan Meghrig Margaret MeghrigNinth Circuit· 1995-03-01· cited 21×
- Kaufman and Broad-South Bay v. Unisys Corp.N.D. California· 1993-05-07· cited 19×
- United States v. Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 1998-01-07· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.