Skip to main content
· 1/12/2001

Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Artra Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 125 F. Supp. 2d 739
  • 31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20420
  • 51 ERC (BNA) 2043
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222
  • 2001 WL 32761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \the statute of limitations of the forum state applies even when that state's choice-of-law rules require that another state's substantive law be applied\
  • “With regard to the date that a claim for contract indemnification accrues, Maryland applies the rule that the claim accrues at the time payment was made by the party seeking indemnification.”
  • “The Maryland courts have followed the general rule that the statute of limitations of the forum state applies even when that state’s choice of law rules require that another state’s substantive law be applied.” (citing Morley v. Cohen, 610 F. Supp. 798, 827 (D. Md. 1985))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smalkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.