· 10/6/1975
Advanced Hydraulics, Inc. v. Otis Elevator Company
Citations
- 525 F.2d 477
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- exchange of correspondence between plaintiff and defendants is critical element as far as plea of estoppel is concerned
- reliance on patentee’s misleading conduct found even though infringer had also informed patentee that infringer’s internal investigation had indicated that there was no infringement
- no estoppel where patentee informed defendant that it would await a ruling in another case before pursuing litigation
- detrimental reliance found when infringer continued to invest in and expanded allegedly infringing business during five-year delay
- expansion of business is evidence of detrimental reliance, prejudice
- death of crucial witness is prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Swygert, Pell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.