Hottel Corp. v. Seaman Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing cases and concluding, “In the cases which have applied intentionally misleading silence in the patent infringement context, a patentee threatened immediate or vigorous enforcement of its patent right but then did nothing for a long time.”
• no estoppel where patentee informed defendant that it would await a ruling in another case before pursuing litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).