Addiego v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• writings contained the specific terms of the agreement and were specifically accepted by plaintiff in a second letter
• writings contained the specific terms of the agreement and were specifically accepted by plaintiff in a second letter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Groves v. Prickett
  Ninth Circuit· 1970-01-07· cited 33×
• Conaway v. 20th Century Corp.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-22· cited 28×
• Colt v. Fradkin
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-03-21· cited 24×
• Seck v. Foulks
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-05-15· cited 16×
• Oracle Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Pier Carlo Falotti, an Individual
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-02-11· cited 8×
• Conaway v. 20th Century Corp.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-12· cited 4×
• Addiego v. Hill
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-05-12· cited 3×
• Forde v. Bank of Finance
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-09-22· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball Sons
  California Supreme Court· 1957-03-19· cited 225×
• Rodriguez v. Barnett
  California Supreme Court· 1959-05-19· cited 116×
• Addiego v. Hill
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-12-20· cited 23×
• Sibert v. Shaver
  California Court of Appeal· 1952-09-04· cited 14×
• Goodman v. Community Savings & Loan Ass'n
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-10-28· cited 8×
• Karl v. JeBien
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-01-21· cited 8×