Skip to main content
C.D. California· 2/25/1980

Adams v. Howerton

Citations

  • 486 F. Supp. 1119
  • 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is beyond dispute that the state has a compelling interest in providing “status and stability to the environment in which children are raise”
  • recognizing government inquiry about couples’ procreation plans or requiring sterility test before issuing marriage licenses would “raise serious constitutional questions.”
  • observing that marriage historically has been defined as the union between persons of different sex
  • finding Baker controlling in case where 13 same-sex spouse appealed denial of petition with INS to be classified as “immediate relative”
  • rejecting the claim that homosexual unions should be recognized as marriages for immigration purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Irving Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.