C.D. California· 2/25/1980
Adams v. Howerton
Citations
- 486 F. Supp. 1119
- 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it is beyond dispute that the state has a compelling interest in providing “status and stability to the environment in which children are raise”
- recognizing government inquiry about couples’ procreation plans or requiring sterility test before issuing marriage licenses would “raise serious constitutional questions.”
- observing that marriage historically has been defined as the union between persons of different sex
- finding Baker controlling in case where 13 same-sex spouse appealed denial of petition with INS to be classified as “immediate relative”
- rejecting the claim that homosexual unions should be recognized as marriages for immigration purposes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irving Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 955×
- Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-11-18· cited 186×
- Windsor v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2012-10-18· cited 139×
- Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-08-12· cited 99×
- Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2006-07-26· cited 70×
- Adams v. HowertonNinth Circuit· 1982-02-25· cited 36×
- Wolf v. WalkerW.D. Wisconsin· 2014-06-06· cited 34×
- Wilson v. AkeM.D. Florida· 2005-01-19· cited 28×
- De Santo v. BarnsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-05-11· cited 23×
- Langan v. St. Vincent's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-10-11· cited 21×
- Smelt v. County of OrangeC.D. California· 2005-06-16· cited 18×
- In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-10-05· cited 5×
- In re the Estate of CooperNew York Surrogate's Court· 1990-12-19· cited 5×
- Opinion No.Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 1995-04-26
- Desanto v. BarnsleyDelaware County Court of Common Pleas· 1982-02-17
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court· 1975-06-24· cited 1,202×
- Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. BellSupreme Court· 1977-04-26· cited 821×
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court· 1956-06-11· cited 393×
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Beaver CountySupreme Court· 1946-05-13· cited 179×
- Baker v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-10-15· cited 150×
- Singer v. HaraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-05-20· cited 75×
- Jones v. HallahanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1973-11-09· cited 61×
- Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York Supreme Court· 1971-08-06· cited 35×
- Gee Chee on v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States of AmericaFifth Circuit· 1958-05-22· cited 17×
- Konstantinos Volianitis v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1965-11-05· cited 15×
- LEVINEBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1969-07-01· cited 11×
- In Re Naturalization of BrodieD. Oregon· 1975-05-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.