· 2/25/1980
Adams v. Howerton
Citations
- 486 F. Supp. 1119
- 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it is beyond dispute that the state has a compelling interest in providing “status and stability to the environment in which children are raise”
- recognizing government inquiry about couples’ procreation plans or requiring sterility test before issuing marriage licenses would “raise serious constitutional questions.”
- observing that marriage historically has been defined as the union between persons of different sex
- finding Baker controlling in case where 13 same-sex spouse appealed denial of petition with INS to be classified as “immediate relative”
- rejecting the claim that homosexual unions should be recognized as marriages for immigration purposes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irving Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.