Skip to main content
· 2/25/1980

Adams v. Howerton

Citations

  • 486 F. Supp. 1119
  • 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is beyond dispute that the state has a compelling interest in providing “status and stability to the environment in which children are raise”
  • recognizing government inquiry about couples’ procreation plans or requiring sterility test before issuing marriage licenses would “raise serious constitutional questions.”
  • observing that marriage historically has been defined as the union between persons of different sex
  • finding Baker controlling in case where 13 same-sex spouse appealed denial of petition with INS to be classified as “immediate relative”
  • rejecting the claim that homosexual unions should be recognized as marriages for immigration purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Irving Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.