Skip to main content

A.D. v. State

Citations

  • 106 So. 3d 67
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1824
  • 2013 WL 439786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the State failed to prove that the juvenile had the intent to commit an offense when he entered the conveyance
  • determining that the State failed to prove that the juvenile had the intent to commit an offense when he entered the conveyance
  • reversing grand theft auto conviction where state failed to present evidence that juvenile knew his friend intended on stealing the van and only entered the stolen van after it was stolen
  • reversing grand theft auto conviction where state failed to present evidence that juvenile knew his friend intended on stealing the van and only entered the stolen van after it was stolen
  • “Because the theft charge fails, so too must the burglary charge to the extent it is based on an intent to steal the van.”
  • “In the context of an automobile theft, [intent] would be shown, if not by aid or participation in the taking of the vehicle, then by some exercise of dominion and control over it afterwards.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crenshaw, Larose, Morris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.