Acosta v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• uncorroborated prior inconsistent statement may alone support a conviction, but cautionary instruction is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-08-21· cited 299×
• People v. Cuevas
  California Supreme Court· 1995-12-26· cited 214×
• State v. Newsome
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-06· cited 111×
• State v. Mancine
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-05-21· cited 66×
• People v. Fratello
  New York Court of Appeals· 1998-12-01· cited 65×
• State v. Seale
  Utah Supreme Court· 1993-02-24· cited 41×
• State v. Robar
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-09-27· cited 34×
• People v. Chavies
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-05-19· cited 31×
• State v. Pierce
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-07-11· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Clements
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-05-10· cited 21×
• United States v. Bahe
  D. New Mexico· 1998-11-25· cited 15×
• State v. Flowers
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2016-10-21· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Moquette
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-01-17· cited 3×
• David S.W. v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1986-05-27· cited 2×
• Taylor v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2013-05-06· cited 2×
• Cannon v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2010-04-01
• Jacobs v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-11-05