People v. Chavies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, although witnesses claimed to remember nothing at trial, inasmuch as their grand jury testimony constituted prior inconsistent statement, the grand jury testimony did not violate the defendant’s right of confrontation
• this Court may affirm where the trial court reaches the right result, albeit for the wrong reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).