Acevedo v. Cerame

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no private right of action under 18 U.S.C. § 876, noting: “[A] private citizen lacks a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or nonprosecution of another.” (quoting Diamond v. Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 64 (1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Hall v. Bellmon
  Tenth Circuit· 1991-06-03· cited 5,616×
• Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 3,220×
• Northington v. Jackson
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-08-17· cited 1,127×
• Diamond v. Charles
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 1,118×
• Curley v. Perry
  Tenth Circuit· 2001-04-18· cited 712×
• Jack v. K. Ragan v. Colonel Weldon W. Cox, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Leavenworth, Kansas
  Tenth Circuit· 1962-06-21· cited 351×
• Buchheit v. Green
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-11-27· cited 159×
• McCarty v. Gilchrist
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-07-14· cited 118×
• Billy Holmes, A/K/A Bill Richards and Daniel Johnson v. Ray Hardy
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-08-16· cited 90×
• Chester L. Oughton v. United States of America (John C. Taylor, Warden)
  Tenth Circuit· 1962-11-01· cited 54×