Abell v. Laihsing Wang

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the plaintiff in that case “had no prior history as a dilatory plaintiff’
• recognizing the “judicial and societal preference for determining cases on the merits”
• finding of willfulness goes considerable way in supporting court’s decision to strike expert’s report
• “The fact that defendants filed their own witness list late further mitigates the prejudice attributable to [plaintiff].”
• noting cases where plaintiff had history of dilatory conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).