Abdallah v. Mesa Air Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that principles of finality create jurisdictional bar to untimely filing of certiorari petition
• holding that principles of finality create jurisdictional bar to untimely filing of certiorari petition
• holding that, where a judgment previously entered has been reentered or revised in an immaterial way, the time within which review must be sought is not tolled
• holding that “the mere fact that a judgment previously entered has been reentered or revised in an immaterial way does not toll the time within which review must be sought.”
• holding that the judgment at issue did not meet the test for whether the time to file a petition for certiorari ran anew as the judgment at issue simply reiterated, without change, everything which had been decided previously
• holding that a second order restarts the appeal period only when the court “disturb[s] or revisefs] legal rights and obligations which, by its prior judgment, had been plainly and properly settled with finality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).