N.D. Illinois· 6/28/2000
Abbott Laboratories v. DEY, LP
Citations
- 110 F. Supp. 2d 667
- 55 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1728
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13659
- 2000 WL 1157142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the doctrine of issue preclusion barred plaintiffs from relitigating claim construction issues decided in an earlier infringement action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Inpro II Licensing, S.A.R.L. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2006-05-11· cited 31×
- Texas Instruments, Inc. v. Linear Technologies Corp.E.D. Texas· 2002-01-15· cited 16×
- Kollmorgen Corp. v. Yaskawa Electric Corp.W.D. Virginia· 2001-06-29· cited 10×
- Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.D. Massachusetts· 2007-07-03· cited 9×
- Allen-Bradley Co. v. Kollmorgen Corp.E.D. Wisconsin· 2001-03-27· cited 9×
- Edberg v. CPI-The Alternative Supplier, Inc.D. Connecticut· 2001-06-04· cited 2×
- Datastrip International Ltd. v. Intacta Technologies, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 2003-03-13· cited 2×
- Louisville Bedding Co. v. Perfect Fit Industries, Inc.W.D. Kentucky· 2001-07-10
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court· 1996-04-29· cited 3,226×
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 2,940×
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1996-07-25· cited 2,428×
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossFederal Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 1,536×
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 1,430×
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossFederal Circuit· 1999-06-23· cited 590×
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionFederal Circuit· 1992-09-23· cited 453×
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1988-06-09· cited 319×
- Bayer Ag and Bayer Corporation v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corporation and Elan Corporation, PlcFederal Circuit· 2000-05-12· cited 226×
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Second Circuit· 1993-04-06· cited 182×
- La Preferida, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. De C v. a Mexican CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1990-12-07· cited 150×
- K-2 Corporation v. Salomon S.A. And Salomon/north America, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1999-09-13· cited 145×
- The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. v. Cambridge Wire Cloth CompanyFederal Circuit· 1989-02-09· cited 117×
- A.B. Dick Company v. Burroughs CorporationFederal Circuit· 1983-07-27· cited 111×
- Sextant Avionique, S.A. v. Analog Devices, Inc., Defendant-Cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1999-02-26· cited 70×
- Johnny Lee Prymer v. Kevin Ogden, Simon Solis, and Mark HollisSeventh Circuit· 1994-07-21· cited 60×
- John H. Hartley, Jr., M.D. v. Mentor Corporation, Defendant/third-Party v. American Hospital Supply Corporation, Third-PartyThird Circuit· 1989-03-14· cited 56×
- In Re Charles P. Morris, Kenneth L. Pottebaum, and John D. StricklinFederal Circuit· 1997-09-22· cited 54×
- Epic Metals Corporation v. H.H. Robertson CompanyFederal Circuit· 1989-06-05· cited 43×
Other cases named Abbott Laboratories v. DEY, LP
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.