The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. v. Cambridge Wire Cloth Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim limitation reciting \link ends being dimensioned and spaced apart by a distance slightly greater than said width\ was satisfied under the doctrine of equivalents by an element with more than \slightly greater\ spacing
• “References to a preferred embodiment, such as those often present in a specification, are not claim limitations.” (emphasis added)
• references in specification to preferred embodiment with a square shaft \not a basis here for limitinq 'noncircular' to square or reqular polyqonal shafts\
• “References to a preferred embodiment, such as those often present in a specification, are not claim limitations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).