Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 5/3/1999
Abba Equipment, Inc. v. Thomason
Citations
- 517 S.E.2d 235
- 335 S.C. 477
- 1999 S.C. App. LEXIS 69
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding [t]he same ground argued on appeal must been argued to the trial judge in order to be addressed on appeal
- \The same ground argued on appeal must have been argued to the trial [court].\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huff, Stilwell, Hearn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cantu v. Howard S. Grossman, P.A.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-05-15· cited 19×
- Moore v. BensonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-09-22· cited 12×
- Manios v. Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, LLPCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-06-15· cited 11×
- Phillips v. QuickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-07-18· cited 6×
- Mark A. Cantu v. Howard S. Grossman, P.A.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-01-29
- Crescent Homes SC, LLC v. CJN, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2024-11-20
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-25· cited 106×
- Byrd v. Irmo High SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-25· cited 98×
- Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. v. Crane National Vendors Division of Unidynamics Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-09-18· cited 63×
- McKissick v. J.F. Cleckley & Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 63×
- Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-06-05· cited 58×
- Lawrence Systems, Inc. Ex Rel. Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corp. v. Superior Feeders, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1994-07-26· cited 47×
- Burgess v. American Cancer Society, South Carolina Division, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 46×
- Langley v. PierceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-11-08· cited 45×
- Hoogenboom v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-04-29· cited 31×
- Windham v. HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-08-25· cited 30×
- Commercial Credit Loans, Inc. v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-01-18· cited 28×
- Hunter Technology, Inc. v. ScottColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-04-25· cited 23×
- Producers Grain Corporation v. CarrollCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-02-05· cited 23×
- Matthews v. City of GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-08-05· cited 19×
- Mills v. KillianSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-04-03· cited 16×
- Wright v. Trust Co. BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-12-19· cited 16×
- O'LAUGHLIN v. WindhamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-03-16· cited 13×
- Jones v. City of Folly BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-02-18· cited 12×
- Hill v. Value Recovery Group, L.P.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1998-09-16· cited 11×
- Payne v. ClaffyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-04-30· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.