O'LAUGHLIN v. Windham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the adoption of the Tort Claims Act did not modify common law judicial immunity in part because of the “presumption of legislative intent to preserve common law principles”
• “A strong presumption also exists that the General Assembly does not intend to supplant common law principles when enacting legislation.”
• “[JJudicial immunity is vital for the continuation of an independent judiciary and for the preservation of judicial integrity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).