Skip to main content
Court of Claims· 1/11/1963

Aaron v. United States

Citations

  • 160 Ct. Cl. 295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing claims based on flights below 500 feet, while denying those based on flights over 500 feet
  • allowing claims based on flights below 500 feet, while denying those based on flights over 500 feet
  • declining to find a taking due to aircraft overflights where only two planes flew over the property per day but finding a physical taking when flights increased to a dozen per day
  • another avigation ease in which the court cited Dickinson to extend the statute of limitations accrual date stating, “[b]efore that time they were uncertain just how serious the impairment would be or how long it would continue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Duefee, Laramoke, Ones, Wiiitaker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Aaron v. United States

15 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.