AA PRIMO BUILDERS, LLC v. Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that any motion seeking to substantively alter a judgment is afforded NRCP 59(e) status
• holding that this this court reviews a district court's decision granting a motion for reconsideration for abuse of discretion
• recognizing that a timely post-judgment motion for reconsideration that seeks a substantive change to the judgment tolls the time to file a notice of appeal
• holding that NRCP 59(e) motions are available to correct manifest errors of law
• recognizing that a timely filed motion for reconsideration may toll the appeal period
• holding that a post-judgment motion for reconsideration that is timely filed, in writing, specifically states its grounds, and asks for a substantive change to the judgment may be afforded NRCP 59(e) status and tolling effect under NRAP 4(a)(4)(C)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).