· 5/25/2006
Winston Products Co. v. DeBoer
Citations
- 134 P.3d 726
- 122 Nev. 517
- 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 48
- 2006 Nev. LEXIS 60
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that timely SUPREME COUR1 OF NEVADA 2 111
- holding that timely SUPREME COUR1 OF NEVADA 2 111
- interpreting NRAP 4(a)(4) in such a manner as to avoid piecemeal litigation and confusion regarding the time for filing a notice of appeal
- interpreting NRAP 4(a)(4) in such a manner as to avoid piecemeal litigation and confusion regarding the time for filing a notice of appeal
- interpreting NRAP 4(a)(4) in such a manner as to avoid piecemeal litigation and confusion regarding the time for filing a notice of appeal
- \This court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal that is filed beyond the time allowed under NRAP 4(a).\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maupin, Gibbons, Hardesty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.