A & B Irrigation District v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the Idaho Administrative Procedure Act provides the procedures for challenging the chosen accounting method”
• “Which accounting method to employ is within the Director’s discretion and the Idaho Administrative Procedure Act provides the procedures for challenging the chosen accounting method.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Blackfoot v. Gary Spackman
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2017-06-20· cited 11×
• South Valley Ground Water v. ID Dept of Water Resources
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2024-01-12· cited 6×
• United States v. Black Canyon Irrigation Dist
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2017-12-21
• Black Canyon Irrig Dist v. State / Suez Water
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2018-01-02

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. Spackman
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2011-03-17· cited 55×
• Baker v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1973-07-26· cited 49×
• American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water Resources
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 45×
• Rincover v. State, Department of Finance
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1999-04-02· cited 36×
• DeRousse v. Higginson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1973-01-17· cited 23×
• Olson v. Idaho Department of Water Resources
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-07-07· cited 21×
• Musser v. Higginson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1994-02-28· cited 20×
• United States v. Pioneer Irrigation District
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2007-03-09· cited 14×
• Thompson Creek Mining Co. v. Idaho Department of Water Resources
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-10-27· cited 12×
• Keller v. Magic Water Company
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1968-04-01· cited 9×