Skip to main content
· 2/28/1994

Musser v. Higginson

Citations

  • 871 P.2d 809
  • 125 Idaho 392
  • 1994 Ida. LEXIS 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that mandamus was appropriate to require the director to deliver the full decreed water rights of a water right holder
  • stating that the Court will review decision whether to award attorney fees under I.C. § 12-117 for abuse of discretion
  • stating that the Court will review decision whether to award attorney fees under I.C. § 12-117 for abuse of discretion
  • abrogated on other grounds by Rincover v. State, Dept. of Finance, 132 Idaho 547, 976 P.2d 473 (1999)
  • iabrogated on other grounds by Rincover v. State Dep’t of Fin., 132 Idaho 547, 976 P.2d 473 (1999)
  • abrogated on other grounds by Rincover v. State Dep’t of Fin., 132 Idaho 547, 976 P.2d 473 (1999)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, McDevitt, Bistline, Trout, Silak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.