Skip to main content

A A Tube Testing Co. v. Sohne

Citations

  • 20 A.D.2d 639
  • 246 N.Y.S.2d 247
  • 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding allegation that defendants “should have known” of existence of contract insufficient allegation of “actual” knowledge
  • dismissing allegations of tortious interference for improperly pleading that the defendant “knew or should have known” “of a particular contract in question”
  • “[T]he plaintiff must allege that the defendants had actual knowledge; an allegation that they 'should have known' of the existence of the contract is insufficient.”
  • “As an essential element of [tortious interference], the plaintiff must allege that the defendants had actual knowledge; an allegation that they ‘should have known’ of the existence of the contract is insufficient.” (emphasis in original)
  • “As an essential element of [tortious interference], the plaintiff must allege that the defendants had actual knowledge; an allegation that they ‘should have known’ of the existence of the contract is insufficient.” (emphasis in original)
  • “As an essential element of the cause of action sought to be pleaded the plaintiff must allege that the defendants had actual knowledge; an allegation that they ‘should have known’ of the existence of the contract is insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.