S.D. New York· 10/29/2002
LinkCo, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd.
Citations
- 230 F. Supp. 2d 492
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20860
- 2002 WL 31427365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that if the basis of a plaintiff’s unfair competition claim is a misappropriated trade secret, then the claims are duplicative and should be treated as a single cause of action
- finding defendant misappropriated plaintiffs confidential information in bad faith and used it for its own benefit where former employee showed defendant plaintiffs confidential information and had secret meetings with defendant
- “Because [the product] cannot remain secret once it is marketed, it cannot rise to the level of a trade secret, as a matter of law.”
- “The parties agree that if the predicate is trade secret 19 misappropriation, then [the plaintiff's] unfair competition claim is duplicative of its trade secret claim.”
- “Computer programs have been found to constitute a trade secret where the source code is not easily copied or ascertainable by inspection of the program.”
- “It is well- established that marketing concepts and new product ideas are not considered trade secrets.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scheindlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berman v. SUGO LLCS.D. New York· 2008-08-05· cited 118×
- Hall v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2013-01-25· cited 79×
- Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2014-05-08· cited 74×
- Medtech Products Inc. v. RANIR, LLCS.D. New York· 2008-09-30· cited 71×
- DSMC, INC. v. Convera Corp.District of Columbia· 2007-03-27· cited 51×
- Astroworks, Inc. v. Astroexhibit, Inc.S.D. New York· 2003-03-11· cited 42×
- Medinol Ltd. v. Boston Scientific Corp.S.D. New York· 2004-12-02· cited 35×
- Reed Construction Data Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.S.D. New York· 2014-09-24· cited 28×
- Linkco, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd.S.D. New York· 2002-11-14· cited 17×
- Kadant, Inc. v. Seeley MacHine, Inc.N.D. New York· 2003-01-30· cited 16×
- Norbrook Laboratories Ltd. v. G.C. Hanford Manufacturing Co.N.D. New York· 2003-12-03· cited 14×
- Cargill, Inc. v. Sears Petroleum & Transport Corp.N.D. New York· 2005-08-25· cited 14×
- Chicago Board Options Exchange v. International Securities ExchangeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-05-25· cited 14×
- Alaskasland.com, LLC v. CrossAlaska Supreme Court· 2015-09-25· cited 13×
- Bulldog New York LLC v. Pepsico, Inc.D. Connecticut· 2014-03-31· cited 13×
- SimplexGrinnell LP v. Integrated Systems & Power, Inc.S.D. New York· 2009-03-31· cited 12×
- Dreamcatcher Software Development, LLC v. Pop Warner Little Scholars, Inc.D. Connecticut· 2004-01-12· cited 11×
- Milton Abeles, Inc. v. Farmers Pride, Inc.E.D. New York· 2009-03-19· cited 11×
- Sorias v. National Cellular USA, Inc.E.D. New York· 2015-08-27· cited 11×
- NewMarkets Partners LLC v. OppenheimS.D. New York· 2009-07-28· cited 10×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- Marilyn GALDIERI-AMBROSINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP., Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1998-02-04· cited 501×
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Second Circuit· 1980-06-05· cited 298×
- Samuel Albert v. Salmen Loksen, Brooklyn Hospital and Karen BuonoSecond Circuit· 1999-08-01· cited 237×
- North Atlantic Instruments, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Fred Haber and Apex Signal Corp., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-AppellantsSecond Circuit· 1999-08-09· cited 200×
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers Inc.Second Circuit· 1971-10-12· cited 197×
- Trandes Corporation v. Guy F. Atkinson Company, and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityFourth Circuit· 1993-06-10· cited 192×
- National Basketball Ass'n v. Motorola, Inc.Second Circuit· 1997-01-30· cited 152×
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc. v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.New York Supreme Court· 1950-10-18· cited 149×
- Craig P. Nadel, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Play-By-Play Toys & Novelties, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 2000-03-27· cited 136×
- Flexitized, Inc., and Flexitized Sales Corporation v. National Flexitized Corporation and Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp.Second Circuit· 1964-08-03· cited 133×
- Norton J. Lehman v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Second Circuit· 1986-01-30· cited 126×
- Phyllis Meloff v. New York Life Insurance CompanySecond Circuit· 2001-02-14· cited 126×
- Roy Export Company Establishment Of Vaduz, Liechtenstein v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Second Circuit· 1982-03-04· cited 92×
- Finley v. GiacobbeSecond Circuit· 1996-01-05· cited 84×
- Electrolux Corp. v. Val-Worth, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1959-07-08· cited 74×
- Hudson Hotels Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, and Robert HazardSecond Circuit· 1993-06-11· cited 70×
- Special Event Entertainment v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.S.D. New York· 1978-09-11· cited 60×
- Q-Co Industries, Inc. v. HoffmanS.D. New York· 1985-12-24· cited 43×
- Eagle Comtronics, Inc. v. Pico, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-07-09· cited 40×
Other cases named LinkCo, Inc. v. Fujitsu Ltd.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.