· 6/6/2000
780 L.L.C. v. DiPrima
Citations
- 611 N.W.2d 637
- 9 Neb. Ct. App. 333
- 2000 Neb. App. LEXIS 168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding inconsistency between title of document and signature line of document created contract ambiguity
- holding inconsistency between title of document and signature line of document created contract ambiguity
- explaining that if agent intends to bind his principal, agent must not only name principal, but must express by some form of words that writing is act of principal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irwin, Sievers, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.