Skip to main content
· 6/6/2000

780 L.L.C. v. DiPrima

Citations

  • 611 N.W.2d 637
  • 9 Neb. Ct. App. 333
  • 2000 Neb. App. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding inconsistency between title of document and signature line of document created contract ambiguity
  • holding inconsistency between title of document and signature line of document created contract ambiguity
  • explaining that if agent intends to bind his principal, agent must not only name principal, but must express by some form of words that writing is act of principal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Irwin, Sievers, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.