· 12/4/2000
Clyde M. Kellogg v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation
Citations
- 233 F.3d 1083
- 11 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 385
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 30697
- 2000 WL 1769656
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that under the ADA “an employer is not required to make accommodations that would subvert other, more qualified applicants for the job.”
- stating that summary judgment is proper in ADA claim where plaintiff fails to establish any element of his prima facie case
- stating that summary judgment is proper in ADA claim where plaintiff fails to establish any element of his prima facie case
- stating that employer's knowledge of impairment without more does not amount to a disability
- assuming, without deciding, that working is a major life activity under the ADA
- “If [the plaintiff] fails to establish any element of [her] prima facie case, summary judgment is proper.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Lay, Beam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.