Skip to main content
· 12/4/2000

Clyde M. Kellogg v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation

Citations

  • 233 F.3d 1083
  • 11 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 385
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 30697
  • 2000 WL 1769656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that under the ADA “an employer is not required to make accommodations that would subvert other, more qualified applicants for the job.”
  • stating that summary judgment is proper in ADA claim where plaintiff fails to establish any element of his prima facie case
  • stating that summary judgment is proper in ADA claim where plaintiff fails to establish any element of his prima facie case
  • stating that employer's knowledge of impairment without more does not amount to a disability
  • assuming, without deciding, that working is a major life activity under the ADA
  • “If [the plaintiff] fails to establish any element of [her] prima facie case, summary judgment is proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Lay, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.