77th District Judge v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was error to grant damages for equal protection violation involving disparate pay for state district court judges
• holding that it was error to grant damages for equal protection violation involving disparate pay for state district court judges
• declining to award damages as a remedy for violation of equal protection clause in case involving disparate compensation for Michigan district judges
• the Court of Claims lacked power to issue injunction in a case involving a district judge’s claim of an equal protection violation because of unequal salaries and benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).