Skip to main content
· 8/28/1979

Hughes v. Judges' Retirement Board

Citations

  • 282 N.W.2d 160
  • 407 Mich. 75
  • 1979 Mich. LEXIS 391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • proscribing retroactivity if “the law ‘takes away or impairs vested rights acquired under existing laws, or creates a new obligation and imposes a new duty, or attaches a new disability with respect to transactions or considerations already past’ ”
  • “A statute is construed to have prospective effect only unless the Legislature expressly, or impliedly, indicates its intention to give it retrospective effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blair, Coleman, Fitzgerald, Kavanagh, Levin, Moody, Ryan, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.