· 8/28/1979
Hughes v. Judges' Retirement Board
Citations
- 282 N.W.2d 160
- 407 Mich. 75
- 1979 Mich. LEXIS 391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- proscribing retroactivity if “the law ‘takes away or impairs vested rights acquired under existing laws, or creates a new obligation and imposes a new duty, or attaches a new disability with respect to transactions or considerations already past’ ”
- “A statute is construed to have prospective effect only unless the Legislature expressly, or impliedly, indicates its intention to give it retrospective effect.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blair, Coleman, Fitzgerald, Kavanagh, Levin, Moody, Ryan, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.