Skip to main content
Texas Supreme Court· 12/31/2004

1464-Eight, Ltd. v. Joppich

Citations

  • 154 S.W.3d 101
  • 48 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 275
  • 2004 Tex. LEXIS 1426
  • 2004 WL 3019231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the false recital of nominal consideration does not preclude the enforcement of an option agreement
  • holding that the false recital of nominal consideration does not preclude the enforcement of an option agreement
  • holding that the false recital of nominal consideration does not preclude the enforcement of an option agreement
  • noting that lack of consideration and failure of 4 consideration are affirmative defenses
  • noting that lack of consideration and failure of consideration are affirmative defenses
  • noting that lack of consideration and failure of consideration are affirmative defenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hecht, Owen, O'Neill, Wainwright, Medina, Smith, Jefferson, Brister

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.