Skip to main content
· 8/24/2000

Fort Worth Independent School District v. City of Fort Worth

Citations

  • 22 S.W.3d 831
  • 2000 WL 566880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that courts may read separate documents that pertain to same transaction as one contract
  • holding that generally a contract is legally binding only if its terms are sufficiently definite to enable a court to understand the parties = obligations
  • concluding that a series of documents between two governmental entities constituted a single, unified contract
  • recognizing that ordinances may be read together as a single contract to determine purpose or intent
  • holding that instruments pertaining to same transaction may be read together to ascertain parties’ intent and that courts may construe documents “as if they were part of a single, unified instrument”
  • holding that a letter agreement whereby the city committed that, if it negotiated a new agreement with Southwestern Bell, it would arrive at an appropriate arrangement to distribute revenue to the school district was not enforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.