S. 385: The Energy Savings and Industrial Competitiveness Act of 2017 (Portman-Shaheen Bill)
Summary
S. 385 Provisions
Also known as the Portman-Shaheen bill, S. 385 has four energy efficiency titles (buildings, industry, federal agencies, and regulatory measures) and one title on budget matters.
Title I would update model building energy codes and encourage adoption by state and local governments and American Indian Tribes (§101); authorize grants to universities to establish building training and assessment centers (§111); authorize matching grants to nonprofit organizations to train industry-certified installers of energy-efficient technologies (§112); and provide technical assistance to help schools improve energy efficiency and install renewable energy equipment (§121).
Title II would improve information outreach to small- and medium-sized manufacturers and provide a 50% match to support energy efficiency internship programs (§202); provide energy efficiency assessments for manufacturers and conduct a “sustainable manufacturing” program (§203); establish a “Supply Star” program that publicly recognizes companies and products that use highly efficient equipment supply chains (§211); and establish rebate programs to spur replacement of energy inefficient electric motors (§221) and energy inefficient electricity transformers (§231).
Title III would direct federal agencies to purchase and maintain energy-efficient information technologies (§301); establish a federal data center energy metric, energy practitioner program, and open data initiative (§302); and establish a pilot project for energy or water conservation in multifamily housing (§303).
Title IV would revise certification requirements for Energy Star program partners (§401); require an ongoing review of private sector green building certification systems (§411); extend existing federal building energy efficiency targets (§421); expand existing efficiency standards for new federal buildings to cover major renovations (§422); and require federally issued home mortgages to consider efficiency (§423).
Title V prescribes how pay-as-you-go compliance would be achieved (§501); and specifies that authorized funding amounts would require appropriations (§502).
Provisions Are Derived from Previous Bills
The provisions in S. 385 trace back to congressional action on a sequence of bills that were considered in the 113th and 114th Congresses. Table 1 shows the evolution of those provisions. Prior bipartisan action to modify or otherwise perfect the provisions peaked in the 113th Congress. Thirteen provisions proposed as amendments to S. 1392 were added as new provisions in S. 2262. The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE)—which has stated support for S. 385 and its predecessors—estimated an energy-saving potential for S. 2262 of 1.8 quadrillion Btu (quads) annually by 2030,with an associated annual cost-saving potential of $16.2 billion. More details about S. 2262 are available in CRS Report R43524, S. 2262, Shaheen-Portman Bill 2014: Energy Savings and Industrial Competitiveness Act.
Early in the 114th Congress, the provisions of S. 2262 (113th Congress) were split into two bills, S. 535 and S. 720. S. 535 contained five of the thirteen “new” provisions in S. 2262, and it was enacted as P.L. 114-11. S. 720 was introduced with virtually all of the other provisions in S. 2262. The provisions of S. 720 (S.Rept. 114-130) were later incorporated into S. 2012, a much broader bill. The Senate passed its version of S. 2012 in April 2016 and the House approved its version in May 2016. Table 1 shows some key differences between the two versions. Progress on reconciling the differences stalled due to a lack of conference committee action on S. 2012. More details about S. 2012 appear in CRS Reports R44291 and R44569. The provisions of S. 385 are nearly identical to those in S. 720.
Support and Opposition
The elements of support and opposition over S. 385 may parallel those for S. 720 (114th Congress) and its predecessor, S. 2262 (113th Congress). Thus, S. 385 may enjoy support from many groups that supported S. 2262, including a variety of businesses, industry associations, and trade groups. The bill may also face opposition from conservative groups like the Heritage Foundation and its affiliated advocacy group, Heritage Action, which opposed S. 2262.
Table 1. S. 385, Evolution of Bill Provisions
(House and Senate versions of S. 2012 only show provisions related to S. 385)
Policy
ProvisionS 385
2017
(115th Cong.)S. 2012
[Senate]
2016
(114th Cong.)S. 2012
[House]
2016
(114th Cong.) S. 720a
2015
(114th Cong.)
S. 2262
2014
(113th Cong.)
S. 1392b
2013
(113th Cong.)
Model Codes
§101
§1001
§3141
§101
§101
§101
Worker Training
111 and 112
1007 and 1008
9001
111 and 112
111 and 112
111 and 112
Schools
121
1003
3131
121
121
no provisionc
Industry
202 and 203
1201
no provision
202 and 203
202 and 203
202 and 203
Supply Star
211
no provision
no provision
211
211
211
Motor Rebate
221
1101
no provision
221
221
221
Transformer Rebate
231
1102
no provision
231
231
231
Federal Agency Info. Tech
301
1009
3111
301
301
301
Federal Agency Data Centers
302
1011
3112
303
303
303
Multifamily Buildings
303
1002
no provision
304
304
no provision
Energy Star Certification
401
1104
no provision
401
401
no provision
High Performance Green Federal Buildings
411
1019
no provision
411
411
no provision
Energy Performance Requirement for Federal Buildings
421
1015
3116
421
431
no provision
Federal Building Efficiency Standards
422
1016
3117
422
432
no provision
Underwriting
423
1502
no provision
423
433
no provision
Voluntary Verification
no provision
1106
3122
431
441
no provision
Budget Offset
no provision
no provision
no provision
no provision
501
401
Source: Various bills, as noted in the table.
Notes:
Five provisions in S. 2262 did not appear in S. 720, but were put into a separate bill, S. 535, which was enacted as P.L. 114-11. They included three “better buildings” provisions, grid-enabled water heaters, and energy information for commercial buildings.
S. 1392 was a trimmed-down version of S. 761 (113th Congress). S. 761, in turn, was a trimmed-down version of S. 1000 from the 112th Congress.
The table specification of “no provision,” means that there was no directly equivalent provision in a bill, even though there may have been a related provision.
Note: CRS reports are prepared for Members of Congress and their staffs. This summary is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.