Collateral Order Doctrine
The judge-made exception to the final judgment rule, from Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan (1949), allowing appeal from a small class of conclusively determined collateral orders.
Encyclopedia entry: Collateral Order Doctrine
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more
Got it!
collateral order doctrine
The collateral order doctrine is an exception to the general rule against allowing interlocutory appeals (appeals on a temporary order issued during the course of litigation ). This doctrine traces its origins to the case Cohen v. Beneficial Loan Co .
As a general rule, only final judgements are appealable. Nonetheless, as noted in Cohen some interlocutory decisions act as final judgments to certain rights. Therefore, interlocutory decisions are appealable under the collateral order doctrine if they fulfill three conditions:
- The interlocutory decision conclusively determined the disputed question
- The disputed question is important and entirely separable from the merits of the action
- The interlocutory decision is effectively unappealable after a final judgment is handed down
For example, in Cohen an interlocutory decision regarding whether a New Jersey statute which required parties to offer a security interest before trial is applicable in federal court was subject to the collateral order doctrine and could therefore be appealed before the trial’s conclusion.
[Last reviewed in July of 2022 by the Wex Definitions Team
]
Wex
Encyclopedia content from Cornell LII Wex (CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5).
Related terms
More legal terms starting with C
Looking for citation help? How to cite law · Citation methodology
See also: Full glossary index
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.