Collateral Attack
A challenge to a conviction or sentence in a separate proceeding rather than on direct appeal, typically through habeas corpus.
Encyclopedia entry: Collateral Attack
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more
Got it!
collateral attack
A collateral attack, also called an indirect attack, is a challenge on the validity of a prior judgment through a new case rather than by a direct appeal . Examples include habeas corpus petitions and claims that a prior judgment was invalid after the opposing party cites it for strategic advantage in a new case.
Under the principles of res judicata , an issue /claim which has already been litigated on the merits is a bar on future lawsuits, the party is collaterally estopped from raising it again. As a result, a party wishing to re-litigate an issue/claim which has already been decided on the merits must show that the initial judgment was invalid by way of a collateral attack.
Common grounds for a collateral attack include a lack of personal jurisdiction , a lack of subject matter jurisdiction , and a failure of due process in the first case. For a collateral attack, the failure of due process is generally an inability for the party being barred to argue their side in court.
For a habeas corpus case, see Miller-El v. Dretke 545 U.S. 231 (2005) .
[Last reviewed in July of 2022 by the Wex Definitions Team
]
Wex
Encyclopedia content from Cornell LII Wex (CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5).
Related terms
More legal terms starting with C
Looking for citation help? How to cite law · Citation methodology
See also: Full glossary index
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.